“YIELDING AND PAYING yearly, to us, our heirs and Successors, for the same, the yearly Rent of Twenty Marks of Lawful money of England, at the Feast of All Saints, yearly, forever, The First payment thereof to begin and be made on the Feast of All Saints which shall be in the year of Our Lord One thousand six hundred Sixty and five; AND also, the fourth part of all Gold and Silver Ore which, with the limits aforesaid, shall, from time to time, happen to be found.” – The Carolina Charter (1663)
“And provided further, that nothing herein contained shall affect the titles or possessions of individuals holding or claiming under the laws heretofore in force, or grants heretofore made by the late King George II, or his predecessors, or the late lords proprietors, or any of them.” – Declaration of Rights, North Carolina Constitution (1776)
As seen above, the Crown still presides over the trust called the 'United States of America', and the syndicate, its heirs, and successors continue to be the main benefactors of the charters, grants, and treaties still in effect today. The Vatican is the co-benefactor with the Crown, thanks to the King’s concession to the Pope in 1213.
“We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal, that inasmuch as we had offended in many ways God and our mother the holy church, and in consequence are known to have very much needed the divine mercy, and can not offer anything worthy for making due satisfaction to God and to the church unless we humiliate ourselves and our kingdoms: we, wishing to humiliate ourselves for Him who humiliated Himself for us unto death, the grace of the Holy Spirit inspiring, not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely concede to God and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church, and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances, for the remission of our own sins and of those of our whole race as well for the living as for the dead; and now receiving and holding them, as it were a vassal, from God and the Roman church, in the presence of that prudent man ... and of the household of the lord pope, we perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his catholic successors and the Roman church, according to the form appended; and in the presence of the lord pope, if we shall be able to come before him, we shall do liege homage to him; binding our successors aid our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to the Roman church without demur.” – KING JOHN's Concession of England and Ireland to the Pope, 15th of May, 1213
America and her inhabitants claim this land as theirs, and that they hold allodial title.
How can this be when they never fully owned it to begin with?
“But this State had no title to the territory prior to the title of the King of Great Britain and his subjects, nor did it ever claim as lord paramount to them. This State was not the original grantor to them, nor did they ever hold by any kind of tenure under the State, or owe it any allegiance or other duties to which an escheat is annexed. How then can it be said that the lands in this case naturally result back by a kind of reversion to this State, to a source from whence it never issued, and from tenants who never held under it?” – MARSHALL v. LOVELESS, 1 N.C. 412 (1801), 2 S.A. 70
“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law, and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” – Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session (1933)
“Even in cases of conquest, the conqueror does no more than displace the sovereign, and assume dominion over the country ... A cession of territory is never understood to be a cession of the property of the inhabitants. The King cedes only that which belongs to him; lands he had previously granted, were not his to cede...” - Treaties and Conventions, page 1253, Department of State (1889)
“The treaty of peace of 1783 between the United States and Great Britain was a mere recognition of pre-existing rights as to territory, and no territory was thereby acquired by way of cession from Great Britain. All British grants are invalid which were made after the Declaration of Independence, and purported to give title to land within the territories of the United States as defined by the Treaty of 1783.” - Treaties and Conventions, page 1339, Department of State (1889)
Independence was recognized, not granted. The forefathers always wanted, listed ad nauseum in the demands made to the Crown prior to the Declaration of Independence, self-determination so as to not be taxed without representation. This is exactly what they obtained in the Paris Peace Treaty, not allodium to the land.
The powers recognized were the States, not the people. 'The People' empowered were the aristocrats who set-up the Corporation, not ordinary people who were governed by the States.
The King of Britain knew the Treaty of Peace (1783) was not worth the paper it was written upon, just as when his predecessor, John, King of England, was stipulated to sign the 'Great Charter' of 1215, but he had taken steps to overcome it, so as to avoid exposure of his Modus Operandi.
Also, the lands (colonies) were not the Crown's to give away, as you saw previously.
After the Declaration of Independence, according to the Secretary of State (see above), ALL British grants were and are invalid.
Americans and the world continually pay tribute to the same masters, via taxes and consumerism. For those in doubt or object, if conquest, war, or separation from an Empire cannot pry the possessions of a business deal, its author and sole president - the Crown - never lost or was in danger of losing its possessions and power. Also, the money that was in existence and being used by the colonies and their subjects, prior to the Revolutionary War, remained their (the Crown's) possessions, real property, on loan to America and her inhabitants, for which it expected and demanded its return for their investment, under its corporate charters and the trusts setup from afar. Was this the only infusion of currency into the Americas? No.
“The capacity of private individuals (British subjects) or of corporations created by the Crown in this country or in Great Britain to hold lands or other property in this country was not affected by the Revolution.
... The property of British corporations in this country is protected by the sixth article of the Treaty of Peace of 1783 in the same manner as those of natural persons, and their title, thus protected, is confirmed by the ninth article of the treaty of 1794, so that it could not be forfeited by any intermediate legislative act or other proceeding for the defect of alienage.
The termination of a treaty by war does not divest rights of property already vested under it.” – Society for Propagation of the Gospel v. Town of New Haven, 21 U.S. 464 (1823)
“... there shall be no future confiscations made nor any prosecutions commenced against any person or persons for, or by reason of, the part which he or they may have taken in the present war, and that no person shall on that account suffer any future loss or damage, either in his person, liberty, or property; and that those who may be in confinement on such charges at the time of the ratification of the treaty in America shall be immediately set at liberty, and the prosecutions so commenced be discontinued.” – Article VI, Definitive Treaty of Peace (1783)
“It is agreed, that British Subjects who now hold Lands in the Territories of the United States, and American Citizens who now hold Lands in the Dominions of His Majesty, shall continue to hold them according to the nature and Tenure of their respective Estates and Titles therein, and may grant Sell or Devise the same to whom they please, in like manner as if they were Natives; and that neither they nor their Heirs or assigns shall, so far as may respect the said Lands, be and the legal remedies incident thereto, be regarded as Aliens.” – Article IX, Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and Navigation (1794)
Beginning in 1778, shortly after the wake of the American Revolution, the colonies were borrowing money from the King of France. The financiers there were the money source. France (the Rothschilds, etc.) continued to loan money to America with the debt reaching 18 million dollars.
This is the foothold Hamilton had over President Washington on whether to allow the money powers and their minions to incorporate within our then-newly formed nation and increase the deficit, or not. Look back at the events that followed since, and you'll see this is exactly what happened.
It seems as a matter of law, a contract entered into voluntarily by someone voids any conflict or injury to an individual’s rights.
They always intended to retain their minerals, money, and clout, as the conquerors knew that the barristers would protect their territorial possessions and charters under America, Inc.
“It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full powers, to wit...” – Article I, Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America, signed at Versailles, July 16th, 1782
Also, take note, this was prior to the Definitive Treaty of Peace, consummated between the United States and the United Kingdom on September 3rd, 1783 in Paris, France. The Crown of France and her financiers made sure their debts were protected and paid before they signed onto this deception. The British Crown on one side, the House of Rothschild on the other, both vying for a piece of America. Britain for their trusts, the Rothschilds for their corporate subversion and control of the Americas, and Rome as the main benefactor of the scheme. The Vatican remains even further in the background than both. However, the Pope stands to unabatedly gain and prosper regardless.
Here are quotes from William Manley German, in a speech to the House of Commons, in December 1912:
“... I believe the plan outlined follows the English system, a system applied to the great banks of England...”
“I start out with this proposition: That the Bank Act, as it has been on the statute book for the past decade, has resulted in the creation of the most powerful monopoly that exists in Canada today. Not only is it powerful, but there is no greater or more tyrannical combine. Tyranny is breathed in every paragraph of the bank bill under consideration (renewal of charters). The Canadian Bankers' Association is not as most other associations. They have powers that no other body in this country has in matters of bank trade within their jurisdiction. They have powers which are autocratic in themselves and in their exercise.”
Senator Robert L. Owen:
“It was not very long until this information was brought to the Rothschild’s Bank, and they saw that here was a nation ready to be exploited; here was a nation setting up an example that they could issue their own money instead of the money coming through the banks.”
Knowing this issue would split the North and the South – to divide and conquer. Was this the only way the Crown attacked America? They used even more subversive ways, the orchestrated inception of the First Bank of the United States, lasting from 1791-1811, and another from 1816-1836, which would not have happened without President Washington creating Federal Districts in every State in March 1791, the same month the banking conglomerate was chartered. Another anecdote you should know or remember is 2/3rd of its stockholders were British. Therefore, the Bank was presided over by the money powers in the Corporation of London.
“1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called ‘States’ as direct possessive estates of the Crown.
The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the 13 colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word 'State' to signify a 'legal estate of possession.' Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would have been written using the word 'states'. By the use of 'State', the significance of government of estate possessions was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America.” – The Informer
Nothing's changed. The 'Hidden Hand' have always implemented the 'divide-&-conquer' and 'rule-by-deception' strategies to its advantage. Why do you think the masses still affiliate themselves with sham party lines such as left vs. right, religious vs. atheist, rich vs. poor, etc.? They still haven't left the programming.
Addendum October 2022: One final fact I'd like to mention here - which upholds the thesis that the good ol' U.S.-of-A. is still under 'British' control - is the existence of the U.K.-based multinational cartel known as SERCO, which admittedly does do business in the Americas, including the United States. To quote from its own 'About Serco North America' page:
“Serco Inc. is the Americas division of Serco Group, plc, one of the world’s leading service companies. Serco serves Federal, state and local governments, along with the Canadian government and commercial customers. We help our customers deliver vital services more efficiently, while increasing the satisfaction of their end customers.
.... Serco professionals advise our customers, as well as design, integrate and deliver solutions that transform how clients achieve their mission and transform government efficiency. We help tackle the big, complex problems of our interconnected world in the areas of defense, citizen services and transportation.”
More proof is allotted to us when one reviews the company's 'Our History' page, detailing its decades-long work with the U.S. federal government and its affiliated alphabet groups such as the Departments of 'Defense' & the Navy. Throughout the page, you'll find inferences about how SERCO and its related corporate conglomerates want to change how the public sector works. To quote:
“Serco established its North American foothold in 1988 when it was incorporated, acquiring companies that shared a similar vision of transforming how public services are delivered.
In 2005, Serco acquired Resource Consultants Inc. (RCI), which expanded its capabilities in IT services, systems engineering, strategic consulting and HR-focused business process management. Then, in 2008 Serco acquired SI International, further broadening its capabilities in IT and professional services in North America and gaining new federal government and DoD relationships. In 2019 Serco acquired the Naval Systems Business Unit of Alion Science and Technology, with a deal that expanded the capabilities that Serco is able to provide to customers in the area of maritime modernization. Most recently, in 2021 Serco acquired Whitney, Bradley & Brown, Inc. (WBB) to strengthen the Company's platform in acquisition and program management services to a range of Department of Defense clients.
Serco Inc. now employs approximately 9,000 people across the U.S. and Canada. The company delivers services to all branches of the U.S. military, federal civilian agencies, state and local agencies, and commercial customers.”
As can be seen in the below weblink, SERCO has its tentacles in every aspect of our U.S. federal financial structure, winning multi-million-dollar contracts & awards from alphabet gangs such as the so-called 'Defense' Department, the Department of Health & Human Services and its subsidiary programs Medicare & Medicaid, the State Department, Homeland Security, Transportation, Labor, and so forth. U.S. Government contractors such as Lockheed Martin, Pfizer, Boeing, Merck, etc. ain't got sh*t in comparison to how much federal tax money this one multinational corporation alone receives annually.
It's also involved in the phony government science business, winning multi-million-dollar contracts from sham American federal agencies such as 'Space Force' and 'NASA' as well as doing promotional vids for "outer space" propaganda. For example, it won a "$33 Million U.S. Space Force Surveillance Systems Contract" last October, according to Press Release Point:
“Serco Inc., a provider of professional, technology, engineering, and management services, has been awarded the new Space Fence Operations and Maintenance contract by the United States Space Force Space Operations Command (SpOC). .... The Space Fence is a second-generation ground-based S-Band radar space surveillance system, strengthening U.S. space superiority through improved Space Domain Awareness (SDA). The contract has a 5-month base period plus five one-year option periods and is valued at $33 million, if all options are exercised.”
As - for all intents-&-purposes - it should be obvious to us by now, the corporation is run by the British Crown from abroad, further proving once again that America’s “independence” from Britain has always been a cruel joke upon the Crown's American subjects. Otherwise, why would the United States outsource much of its national government services & programs to a foreign multinational group which belongs to a country it supposedly broke free from two centuries ago? It's like, say, imagining the fledgling First French Republic willingly outsourcing its public services and selling its government secrets to hostile countries such as Austria in the midst of the Revolution of 1789 when it was desperate to survive as a newly-formed nation borne from the ashes of the Ancien Regime. What does that tell us about America's true relation to its supposed rival - Great Britain - upon learning about SERCO? Our official history has been a complete lie from start-to-finish. We clearly have always been a British colony, as the evidence shows.
For more info on SERCO and its people, look into:
SERCO: The Mother of all Multinational Corporations - America Out Loud (click blue link)
Rupert Soames, SERCO chief-executive-officer - Wikipedia (click blue link)